I'm writing a CGI Mario movie for Disney

The place to discuss other entertainment such as movies, television, art, literature, and music.
User avatar
IloveJeffDunham
Member
Member
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:41 pm

#21

Post by IloveJeffDunham » Sun Apr 21, 2013 6:39 pm

X-3 wrote:Sounds good, but Ray Earl Jones should voice Yoshi.
Is he related to James Earl Jones?

- - - Updated - - -
Dizzy wrote:Pity, isn't it?
If you're talking about me...I don't care, I'm just writing one movie

User avatar
X-3
Member
Member
Posts: 24173
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 2:00 am
Location: noiɈɒɔo⅃
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 218 times

#22

Post by X-3 » Sun Apr 21, 2013 6:44 pm

Though you'll have to get someone else for Luigi and Waluigi, Robin Wiliams and Adam Sandler will be too busy playing Eggman and Sonic respectively in my Sonic movie by Universal Studios, directed by Christopher Nolan. Don't think of bringing in Kenan Thompson or Shia Labeouf though, they're playing Knuckles and Tails.

User avatar
VG_Addict
Member
Member
Posts: 10023
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 6:24 pm
Location: In the Vicinity
Been thanked: 225 times

#23

Post by VG_Addict » Sun Apr 21, 2013 6:52 pm

IloveJeffDunham wrote:Oh...voice actors...as in people who don't show up on screen, don't get paid much, not as recognizable, don't walk the red carpet or get an Oscar nomination
You honestly expect this to be nominated for an Oscar? Dude, you're writing a CGI movie for a VIDEO GAME CHARACTER. You're not writing the next Citizen Kane. Let's try to be a little more realistic.

b l a n k
Member
Member
Posts: 1994
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2013 8:17 pm

#24

Post by b l a n k » Sun Apr 21, 2013 7:15 pm

IloveJeffDunham wrote:Never heard of any of them
Perhaps, then, you should broaden your horizon, because I know who John DiMaggio is, and he's in my fantasy cast for Donkey Kong: Nintendo's First as the voice of Misc. Kritters.

On an irrelevant note, I've also got Mr. T as DK and Simon Helberg as Diddy. Come on, man. A big, burly black guy and a nebbishy Woody Allen-type playing off each other. Now THAT would be comedy!

DIDDY: Hey, hey, take it easy! You're forgetting about K. Rool...
DK: I pity K. Rool!

- - - Updated - - -
IloveJeffDunham wrote:Oh...voice actors...as in people who don't show up on screen, don't get paid much, not as recognizable, don't walk the red carpet or get an Oscar nomination
Does getting an Oscar matter that much to you?

- - - Updated - - -
VG_Addict wrote:Let's try to be a little more realistic.
I know this guy. Realistic isn't even in his vocabulary.

User avatar
IloveJeffDunham
Member
Member
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:41 pm

#25

Post by IloveJeffDunham » Sun Apr 21, 2013 7:49 pm

VG_Addict wrote:You honestly expect this to be nominated for an Oscar? Dude, you're writing a CGI movie for a VIDEO GAME CHARACTER. You're not writing the next Citizen Kane. Let's try to be a little more realistic.
Beauty and the Beast, Toy Story 3, and Up were nominated for Best Picture

b l a n k
Member
Member
Posts: 1994
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2013 8:17 pm

#26

Post by b l a n k » Sun Apr 21, 2013 7:50 pm

But you're missing the point, dude! Those movies aren't about video games! Movies based on video games have been historically frowned upon by all the Ebert-types.

User avatar
IloveJeffDunham
Member
Member
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:41 pm

#27

Post by IloveJeffDunham » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:00 pm

Colonel KR wrote:But you're missing the point, dude! Those movies aren't about video games! Movies based on video games have been historically frowned upon by all the Ebert-types.
Maybe it's because those kind of movies fit better in animation, like my video game film is animation... CGI animation like the games

- - - Updated - - -

I am doing my best to be realistic as possible

b l a n k
Member
Member
Posts: 1994
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2013 8:17 pm

#28

Post by b l a n k » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:18 pm

IloveJeffDunham wrote:Maybe it's because those kind of movies fit better in animation, like my video game film is animation... CGI animation like the games

I am doing my best to be realistic as possible
1. No, no, you’re still missing the point. The point is, REGARDLESS OF ANIMATION STYLE, IT’S STILL A MOVIE BASED ON A VIDEO GAME. Movies based on pre-existing franchises - live action, animated, or made of LEGO - have always been seen as the definition of low-brow entertainment.

Succeeding in Hollywood requires years of hard work and making connections (which neither you nor I have, but there you go), and yet, you're acting like you can get this sold any time tomorrow. If you think being able to succeed off of just one script is as easy as 1-2-3-I-became-a-millionaire-by-the-time-I-graduated-high-school, you seriously have no idea how Hollywood works! Have you learned nothing since we last met?

2. Elaborate on what you think "realistic" means, won't you?

User avatar
The Flattest Pancake
Member
Member
Posts: 2121
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 6:32 pm
Location: Occasionals HQ

#29

Post by The Flattest Pancake » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:21 pm

Everything Colonel said right there. Video game movies can be successful (e.g. Wreck-It Ralph).

But that wasn't chock full of Oscar-grade actors/actresses.
"You tried your hardest, and you failed miserably. The lesson is: never try."

DarkZero
Member
Member
Posts: 35598
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 2:15 pm
Has thanked: 221 times
Been thanked: 832 times
Contact:

#30

Post by DarkZero » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:22 pm

Wreck-It Ralph was less a movie about a video game than it was a movie set in a video game world, though.
shane nuked my best posts

User avatar
The Flattest Pancake
Member
Member
Posts: 2121
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 6:32 pm
Location: Occasionals HQ

#31

Post by The Flattest Pancake » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:26 pm

Dizzy wrote:Wreck-It Ralph was less a movie about a video game than it was a movie set in a video game world, though.
True, very true.

I guess it is very tough to find a video game movie that wasn't bad. Not everyone wants Doom starring The Rock or Super Mario Brothers starring Dennis Hopper.
"You tried your hardest, and you failed miserably. The lesson is: never try."

b l a n k
Member
Member
Posts: 1994
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2013 8:17 pm

#32

Post by b l a n k » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:30 pm

Dizzy wrote:Wreck-It Ralph was less a movie about a video game than it was a movie set in a video game world, though.
Pretty much. I've seen films that are self-reflexive about the film industry, but Ralph is self-reflexive with regards to the video game industry.

User avatar
IloveJeffDunham
Member
Member
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:41 pm

#33

Post by IloveJeffDunham » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:32 pm

Colonel KR wrote:1. No, no, you’re still missing the point. The point is, REGARDLESS OF ANIMATION STYLE, IT’S STILL A MOVIE BASED ON A VIDEO GAME. Movies based on pre-existing franchises - live action, animated, or made of LEGO - have always been seen as the definition of low-brow entertainment.

Succeeding in Hollywood requires years of hard work and making connections (which neither you nor I have, but there you go), and yet, you're acting like you can get this sold any time tomorrow. If you think being able to succeed off of just one script is as easy as 1-2-3-I-became-a-millionaire-by-the-time-I-graduated-high-school, you seriously have no idea how Hollywood works! Have you learned nothing since we last met?

2. Elaborate on what you think "realistic" means, won't you?
Do you honestly think I'm that cocky?

- - - Updated - - -
Colonel KR wrote:1. No, no, you’re still missing the point. The point is, REGARDLESS OF ANIMATION STYLE, IT’S STILL A MOVIE BASED ON A VIDEO GAME. Movies based on pre-existing franchises - live action, animated, or made of LEGO - have always been seen as the definition of low-brow entertainment.

Succeeding in Hollywood requires years of hard work and making connections (which neither you nor I have, but there you go), and yet, you're acting like you can get this sold any time tomorrow. If you think being able to succeed off of just one script is as easy as 1-2-3-I-became-a-millionaire-by-the-time-I-graduated-high-school, you seriously have no idea how Hollywood works! Have you learned nothing since we last met?

2. Elaborate on what you think "realistic" means, won't you?
Realistic means creative

User avatar
The Flattest Pancake
Member
Member
Posts: 2121
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 6:32 pm
Location: Occasionals HQ

#34

Post by The Flattest Pancake » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:35 pm

IloveJeffDunham wrote:Realistic means creative
Yes, but not too creative. Being creative is a good thing, but if you want to be realistic, you have to tone it down a bit.
"You tried your hardest, and you failed miserably. The lesson is: never try."

DarkZero
Member
Member
Posts: 35598
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 2:15 pm
Has thanked: 221 times
Been thanked: 832 times
Contact:

#35

Post by DarkZero » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:42 pm

^Except no. Many people believe that realism and creativity are opposing ends of the same scale, when they are, in fact, two perpendicular scales.
shane nuked my best posts

User avatar
IloveJeffDunham
Member
Member
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:41 pm

#36

Post by IloveJeffDunham » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:43 pm

The Flattest Pancake wrote:Yes, but not too creative. Being creative is a good thing, but if you want to be realistic, you have to tone it down a bit.
I am by not following the games too much, I'm trying to follow them as close as I can

User avatar
Random User
Member
Member
Posts: 13217
Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2009 11:54 am
Location: SECRET BASE INSIDE SNAKE MOUNTAIN
Has thanked: 70 times
Been thanked: 41 times
Contact:

#37

Post by Random User » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:46 pm

IloveJeffDunham wrote:Realistic means creative
No, it means "Having or showing a sensible and practical idea of what can be achieved or expected."

So I see where you went wrong.

b l a n k
Member
Member
Posts: 1994
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2013 8:17 pm

#38

Post by b l a n k » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:47 pm

IloveJeffDunham wrote:Do you honestly think I'm that cocky?
No, I’m not saying you’re cocky BY NATURE as much as you are ACTING cocky. What a person is by nature and how a person acts are two distinct concepts. Also, your first post drips with blind confidence because it doesn’t say anything like, “Maybe, maybe not, we’ll never know,” as my first post does. In Hollywood, as in all art, it’s a lot about probabilities.

- - - Updated - - -
The Flattest Pancake wrote:Yes, but not too creative. Being creative is a good thing, but if you want to be realistic, you have to tone it down a bit.
Don’t go there, dude. He will hit you over the head with “I’m trying to be original!” until the cows come home.

- - - Updated - - -
Random User wrote:No, it means "Having or showing a sensible and practical idea of what can be achieved or expected."

So I see where you went wrong.
Ding ding ding! You got one right! May I take Disney Mario Movie with All A-List Cast Improbability for $200, Alex?

User avatar
Tyler
Member
Member
Posts: 3991
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 7:20 am
Location: Controlling the East Coast.
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 5 times

#39

Post by Tyler » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:53 pm

It....it just can't happen.

User avatar
IloveJeffDunham
Member
Member
Posts: 28
Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:41 pm

#40

Post by IloveJeffDunham » Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:56 pm

Random User wrote:No, it means "Having or showing a sensible and practical idea of what can be achieved or expected."

So I see where you went wrong.
And that's what I'm doing in this movie

Locked