James Cameron's Avatar
- CaptHayfever
- Supermod
- Posts: 40615
- Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2002 1:00 am
- Location: (n) - the place where I am
- Has thanked: 1220 times
- Been thanked: 803 times
- Contact:
- Bomby
- Member
- Posts: 23009
- Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2000 1:00 am
- Location: Little Forest
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been thanked: 51 times
- Contact:
My other problem with the current 3D in movies is that realistic (and in my opinion, more aesthetically pleasing) 3D would have objects seeming to recede further within the screen, not popping out of it. I'm not completely anti-3D technology, but at the moment I don't think it's very good and I feel like it's developing in the wrong direction.
That being said, it has made leaps and bounds.
That being said, it has made leaps and bounds.
- t3hDarkness
- Member
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 1:51 am
- Location: When I die, I die in Steam!
I wasn't interested in watching Avatar until the Pope's spokesmansaid something against it.
If the pope hates it, it has to be cool, like wild orgies and devil music, right.
I get the feeling I'm going to be disappointed.
If the pope hates it, it has to be cool, like wild orgies and devil music, right.
I get the feeling I'm going to be disappointed.
- Bomby
- Member
- Posts: 23009
- Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2000 1:00 am
- Location: Little Forest
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been thanked: 51 times
- Contact:
Actually, the Vatican just thought it was boring. Better article here:
Vatican calls 'Avatar' bland - Telegraph
Vatican calls 'Avatar' bland - Telegraph
- t3hDarkness
- Member
- Posts: 7416
- Joined: Mon Oct 30, 2006 1:51 am
- Location: When I die, I die in Steam!
- Valigarmander
- Member
- Posts: 51366
- Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 8:22 pm
- Location: World -1
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 508 times
- Contact:
- CaptHayfever
- Supermod
- Posts: 40615
- Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2002 1:00 am
- Location: (n) - the place where I am
- Has thanked: 1220 times
- Been thanked: 803 times
- Contact:
^They've reviewed movies for decades, mostly for moral screening. They just usually don't get major press about it because they haven't given a billion-dollar film a negative review until now.
You just got served.
And remember, "I'm-a Luigi, number one!"
The pope hates genocide.t3hDarkness wrote:If the pope hates it, it has to be cool, like wild orgies and devil music, right.
I get the feeling I'm going to be disappointed.
You just got served.
And remember, "I'm-a Luigi, number one!"
- Valigarmander
- Member
- Posts: 51366
- Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 8:22 pm
- Location: World -1
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 508 times
- Contact:
- Valigarmander
- Member
- Posts: 51366
- Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 8:22 pm
- Location: World -1
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 508 times
- Contact:
- Deepfake
- Member
- Posts: 41808
- Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2002 1:00 am
- Location: Enough. My tilde has tired and shall take its leave of you.
- Has thanked: 107 times
- Been thanked: 47 times
- Contact:
^ Yeah, admissions make a big difference, especially when the price of admission gets jacked up further every so often, inflation or not.
Saw this flic, btw. I think you'd have to be a making a big assumption to say the film makes any allegorical statements about Americans, or anything, really. I'd say it was a dirt-stupid action plot, but it was no Transformers 2. One thing I've got to say: how many times can Hollywood re-use the same crappy character archetypes? But, I digress. This film was scripted in the 90's. It has a 90's plot. There is literally nothing new here, but it is nowhere near as bad as the most recent action flics - this is a film that had half-decent pacing and a clear focus the whole way through. It's Jurassic Park level story-telling. The characters deal well with some rather lame story concepts, and there's a lot of running through jungles, but it's all blatantly setup because someone needed a plot.
All the same, there is one thing I have seriously got to say: Where is the imagination? Or even just the logic? Avatar seems to have gotten the two mixed up. The comment about the rhinos fighting mechs. It is what I am talking about here. There were literally no new ideas for wildlife or anything you'd associate with concept building. Some idiot literally just said "HEY IF WE HAD THIS CAT, BUT IT'S NOT REALLY A CAT..." for basically everything in the film.
And here's some HEAVY food for thought, that makes the film totally unbelievable: Body language, and form. Sure, the aliens have tails and senselessly huge scilia sprouting from their hair. They are blue, because, well, apparently they're blue for the **** of it. Their bodies are the same proportions as humans, though. Big eyes? Yeah, fine. But their arm-to height, everything, it's identical. Their gate is identical, even with a tail. Their body language, though, that's where we really hit a wall. These are totally alien life forms, and they have identical body language to western-style human culture? I don't buy it. Anyone with half a brain should have seen why that was just out-and-out beyond unlikely.
Saw this flic, btw. I think you'd have to be a making a big assumption to say the film makes any allegorical statements about Americans, or anything, really. I'd say it was a dirt-stupid action plot, but it was no Transformers 2. One thing I've got to say: how many times can Hollywood re-use the same crappy character archetypes? But, I digress. This film was scripted in the 90's. It has a 90's plot. There is literally nothing new here, but it is nowhere near as bad as the most recent action flics - this is a film that had half-decent pacing and a clear focus the whole way through. It's Jurassic Park level story-telling. The characters deal well with some rather lame story concepts, and there's a lot of running through jungles, but it's all blatantly setup because someone needed a plot.
All the same, there is one thing I have seriously got to say: Where is the imagination? Or even just the logic? Avatar seems to have gotten the two mixed up. The comment about the rhinos fighting mechs. It is what I am talking about here. There were literally no new ideas for wildlife or anything you'd associate with concept building. Some idiot literally just said "HEY IF WE HAD THIS CAT, BUT IT'S NOT REALLY A CAT..." for basically everything in the film.
And here's some HEAVY food for thought, that makes the film totally unbelievable: Body language, and form. Sure, the aliens have tails and senselessly huge scilia sprouting from their hair. They are blue, because, well, apparently they're blue for the **** of it. Their bodies are the same proportions as humans, though. Big eyes? Yeah, fine. But their arm-to height, everything, it's identical. Their gate is identical, even with a tail. Their body language, though, that's where we really hit a wall. These are totally alien life forms, and they have identical body language to western-style human culture? I don't buy it. Anyone with half a brain should have seen why that was just out-and-out beyond unlikely.
I muttered 'light as a board, stiff as a feather' for 2 days straight and now I've ascended, ;aughing at olympus and zeus is crying
- Valigarmander
- Member
- Posts: 51366
- Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 8:22 pm
- Location: World -1
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 508 times
- Contact:
- Bomby
- Member
- Posts: 23009
- Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2000 1:00 am
- Location: Little Forest
- Has thanked: 21 times
- Been thanked: 51 times
- Contact:
My cinematography professor gave the best breakdown of Avatar's plot on Thursday:
"We want what's under the tree, so we have to get the blue people off of the tree. So one guy becomes one of the blue people, and then decided he likes them better, so now we want to keep the humans from destroying the tree."
"We want what's under the tree, so we have to get the blue people off of the tree. So one guy becomes one of the blue people, and then decided he likes them better, so now we want to keep the humans from destroying the tree."
- Deepfake
- Member
- Posts: 41808
- Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2002 1:00 am
- Location: Enough. My tilde has tired and shall take its leave of you.
- Has thanked: 107 times
- Been thanked: 47 times
- Contact:
Klingons aren't a recent invention. You're comparing technology with an absence of technology. Wut. I don't even.Valigarmander wrote:^^ Next, rant about Klingons.
Also, Star Trek blows.
I muttered 'light as a board, stiff as a feather' for 2 days straight and now I've ascended, ;aughing at olympus and zeus is crying
- Valigarmander
- Member
- Posts: 51366
- Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 8:22 pm
- Location: World -1
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 508 times
- Contact:
- Greenmarioman
- Member
- Posts: 18106
- Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 8:16 pm
- Location: the leather club two blocks down
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 2 times
- Contact:
- Booyakasha
- Supermod
- Posts: 21729
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2000 2:00 am
- Location: Wisconsinland
- Has thanked: 450 times
- Been thanked: 2136 times