Star Wars Live-Action TV series

Valigarmander · #21

Chunky Kong12345 wrote:I've heard IV was better than Temple of Doom :V

For a second I thought you meant Star Wars IV, and I was about ready to beat your ass in with a rototiller.

Calamity Panfan · #22

wariovswario wrote:What's your definition of Good? Calling something crap because YOU didn't like it is not fair. I don't see why anyone should have a negative opinion of this ESPECIALLY SINCE IT ISN'T EVEN OUT YET!!!!!!!!!

1. I can't call something I don't like crap? I thought that was, you know, part of not liking it, that you think it's crap. Thank you for clearing this up.

2. See: Pitcher post.

Demonicus Prime wrote:Well, if the "quality" you're talking about includes the Force Unleashed, Ep. III, The original Clone Wars, and the prequels in general, then I'm all for this.

Don't jump on the "oh the prequels suck" bandwagon. The only reason people liked the original trilogy better is because half the people that bitch were 6 when they first saw it.

I'm not saying they're bad for bandwagon purposes. III's definitely an 8/10, and II's somewhere between 6 and 7. I didn't like I at all though besides action sequences. The video games are awesome, I've gotta admit that. (Especially KOTOR, Battlefront II, Lego Star Wars, and Jedi Knight) And Clone Wars was an awesome series.

As with Gale, I'm mainly focusing on his latest efforts, such as Indy IV (which you cannot convince me is good. That's not nostalgic either. I didn't like Temple of Doom at all either) and 3D Clone Wars

But yeah, there is some nostalgic factor for the original trilogy. Though III's about the same as VI in my book.

Rainbow Dash · #23

Winston Payne wrote:For a second I thought you meant Star Wars IV, and I was about ready to beat your ass in with a rototiller.

I'm confused as to why that confusion would warrant a rototiller ass-beating.

Valigarmander · #24

Chunky Kong12345 wrote:I'm confused as to why that confusion would warrant a rototiller ass-beating.

I didn't like Temple of Doom too much. Nowhere as good as Raiders. And thinking I heard you compare it to the original Star Wars and bring it the victor sent me into a movie nerd's rage.

Rainbow Dash · #25

Hmm. You took that differently than how I intended that to be heard. Wasn't being sarcastic.

Irregardless,

Valigarmander · #26

...I'm confused.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Erdawn Il Deus · #27

There may be some nostalgia factor in liking the original trilogy but to suggest that the 'prequels' are of higher cinematic quality is ridiculous.

Kargath · #28

Han Solo is the entire reason for the Original Trilogy's success.

Demonicus Prime · #29

Because I mean, the storyline layed out by the Vader-Luke relationship or the eventual overthrow of the Emperor, or any other part of the story had nothing to do with it.

And like I said, the only reason people think 4-6 are better is because of nostalgia.

1-up Salesman · #30

It could be good if done with episodes like this

1. An episode about Boba Fett becoming a Bounty Hunter, and for him to be a major character.

2. Alot of episodes about Darth Vader, just being awesome.

3. A 4-part story about Galen Marek/ Starkiller/ The Apprentice being trained.

Galefore · #31

^To the first, yes, Boba's story could be further explored, but if I'm not mistaken there has been a lot of Expanded Universe material doing just that. An episode/arc would be interesting, though. As to Vader, they're sure to use him a ****load, and to the third, eh, nah, Starkiller is pretty adequately explored in Force Unleashed. It'd be kind of overkill to squeeze the character dry.

Joker · #32

Jedi Master Quinlan-Vos !!!! That's all this live action show needs.

#33

Demonicus Prime wrote:And like I said, the only reason people think 4-6 are better is because of nostalgia.

Yeah. Not buying that one at all.

Rainbow Dash · #34

Booyakasha wrote:Yeah. Not buying that one at all.

are you implying that the prequels were sub-par, good sir

because that is something i have never heard in my days on this earth

#35

That the prequels are lousy is old news.

This 'anyone who thinks the prequels are lousy is just looking at the past through the rosy-tinted glasses of halcyon days gone by' line of crap is new news.

Rainbow Dash · #36

what didn't you like about the prequels (that isn't the romance or jar-jar)

Valigarmander · #37

^ Portman and Christensen's acting?

Rainbow Dash · #38

Chunky Kong12345 wrote:(that isn't the romance)

Valigarmander · #39

I meant, their acting in general, not necessarily between each other.

Rainbow Dash · #40

I dunno, he plays a good angsty, guilt-ridden teen/young adult.