Page 1 of 2
Sausage Party
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 3:12 am
by Valigarmander
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 3:15 am
by I REALLY HATE POKEMON!
Seems like it might be okay.
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 3:36 am
by Booyakasha
I'm sorry, 'another' unfunny Seth Rogen movie? Like, implying he's had nothing but?
Not to say he hasn't had a couple stinkers, but Seth Rogen's hits outweigh his misses, far as I'm concerned. He certainly isn't at the 'throw up your hands and dismiss as a lost cause' stage, the way Seth McFarlane, Happy Madison and them Setzer/Freiberg assh*les are.
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 10:23 am
by Apollo the Just
truly the peak of cinema
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 10:33 am
by Bomby
Okay, we're all missing the point here:
How the **** does pubic hair earn an NC-17 rating? For ****'s sake, you can kill a bunch of people and still get away with a PG-13.
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 10:36 am
by Deku Tree
No interest at all, but I generally like Seth Rogen.
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 11:23 am
by United Nations
Ehhhhh. Feel like I could only watch this and enjoy it if I was under the influence of something.
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 11:54 am
by X-3
Looks like a masterpiece, the best film made by a human of being origin.
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 12:31 pm
by Booyakasha
[QUOTE="Bomby, post: 1604662, member: 17840"]Okay, we're all missing the point here:
How the **** does pubic hair earn an NC-17 rating? For ****'s sake, you can kill a bunch of people and still get away with a PG-13.[/QUOTE]
Full frontal nudity is generally an R. NC-17 requires actual sexual content, doesn't it? 'Showgirls' was an NC-17 (and it really shouldn't have been----------most of it was incredibly tame, compared to things you can watch on the internet today for free) (most of it was incredibly lame, come to that. Bad movie. Not really even the entertaining kind of bad, unless one has an unseemly desire to see the Kwisatz Haderach locked in coitus with the weird-looking nerd-girl from 'Saved By the Bell'. Pretty boring and trite). 'Caligula' was an X (I'll concede that was deserved. There's the entertaining kind of bad. Hardcore porn, plus performances by Malcolm McDowell, Helen Mirren and Peter O'Toole?!? Hey, don't go threatening me with a good time!!). The mere depiction of pubic hair shouldn't put something on a level above 'Kill Bill', is the main point, especially in a CGI flick.
...one presumes there's going to be some outrage about this movie, incidentally. I mean, it's bound to occur--------some people are going to take their kids to this, ignoring the R-rating because they're f*cking retarded, and they're going to raise Cain after the fact. I believe it's inevitable.
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 2:42 pm
by Deepfake
Scrote hair: we don't do that here. All testes must be shaven.
I think Rogen's made some funny stuff on occasion, but I haven't seen anything recently that clicked.
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 5:08 pm
by I REALLY HATE POKEMON!
[QUOTE="Bomby, post: 1604662, member: 17840"]Okay, we're all missing the point here:
How the **** does pubic hair earn an NC-17 rating? For ****'s sake, you can kill a bunch of people and still get away with a PG-13.[/QUOTE]
Both should warrant R, IMO.
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 7:15 pm
by Marilink
This movie looks unbelievably bad.
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 8:01 pm
by I REALLY HATE POKEMON!
Really? Seems like a dumb fun spin on the normal CGI cartoons.
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 8:09 pm
by DarkZero
I think it's going to be the first R-rated CGI cartoon so that's cool but the movie doesn't seem to have much going for it beyond shock value.
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 8:42 pm
by Marilink
The animation is so ugly I'm having a hard time looking at it. I saw half a trailer on YouTube and felt compelled to just turn it off.
Posted: Tue Aug 09, 2016 8:51 pm
by I REALLY HATE POKEMON!
It is a bit bad looking. Seems like late 90's stuff.
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2016 12:04 am
by Calamity Panfan
i kinda want to see it because i like the cast but the animation style reminds me of the **** animated movies you see on Netflix
though knowing the people involved, the low-budget animation style could be a reference to Foodfight, I guess, because I've seen people compare the concept to Foodfight.
Posted: Wed Aug 10, 2016 1:42 am
by Deepfake
[QUOTE="Marilink, post: 1604734, member: 23215"]The animation is so ugly I'm having a hard time looking at it. I saw half a trailer on YouTube and felt compelled to just turn it off.[/QUOTE]
I feel that way about almost all CGI though
I watched the trailer a second time and still had a laugh at it, so I'm not 100% on this being a bad one, tbh.
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 6:36 pm
by Valigarmander
The movie isn't doing too bad with the critics, which I didn't expect.
I've also been told the movie is about religion and existentialism, which I also didn't expect.
Posted: Tue Aug 16, 2016 7:06 pm
by X-3
On a negative note, there have been accusations that many animators were treated poorly by Nitrogen Studios. (unpaid overtime, uncredited in final product, etc.) You can find them
here in the comments.