#9
Post
by Booyakasha » Tue Aug 09, 2016 12:31 pm
[QUOTE="Bomby, post: 1604662, member: 17840"]Okay, we're all missing the point here:
How the **** does pubic hair earn an NC-17 rating? For ****'s sake, you can kill a bunch of people and still get away with a PG-13.[/QUOTE]
Full frontal nudity is generally an R. NC-17 requires actual sexual content, doesn't it? 'Showgirls' was an NC-17 (and it really shouldn't have been----------most of it was incredibly tame, compared to things you can watch on the internet today for free) (most of it was incredibly lame, come to that. Bad movie. Not really even the entertaining kind of bad, unless one has an unseemly desire to see the Kwisatz Haderach locked in coitus with the weird-looking nerd-girl from 'Saved By the Bell'. Pretty boring and trite). 'Caligula' was an X (I'll concede that was deserved. There's the entertaining kind of bad. Hardcore porn, plus performances by Malcolm McDowell, Helen Mirren and Peter O'Toole?!? Hey, don't go threatening me with a good time!!). The mere depiction of pubic hair shouldn't put something on a level above 'Kill Bill', is the main point, especially in a CGI flick.
...one presumes there's going to be some outrage about this movie, incidentally. I mean, it's bound to occur--------some people are going to take their kids to this, ignoring the R-rating because they're f*cking retarded, and they're going to raise Cain after the fact. I believe it's inevitable.
boo--------------a real american weirdo