Disney turns away from hand-drawn animation

The place to discuss other entertainment such as movies, television, art, literature, and music.
Post Reply
User avatar
Valigarmander
Member
Member
Posts: 51366
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: World -1
Has thanked: 119 times
Been thanked: 508 times
Contact:

Disney turns away from hand-drawn animation

#1

Post by Valigarmander » Sat Mar 09, 2013 12:58 pm

http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2013/mar ... -animation
Disney, the Hollywood titan which brought the world classics such as Fantasia, Bambi and Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, has admitted it has no current plans to make hand drawn animated films.

Speaking at an annual shareholder's meeting in Phoenix, Arizona, on Wednesday, chief executive Bob Iger revealed that none of the studio's animation companies was working on 2D, hand-drawn material for the big screen. While Iger did not rule out returning in the future to the style which made the company famous, the long gestation period for Hollywood animated productions means a gap of several years before any new film might emerge.

"To my knowledge we're not developing a 2D or hand-drawn feature animated film right now," said Iger. "There is a fair amount of activity going on in hand-drawn animation but it's largely for television at this point. We're not necessarily ruling out the possibility [of] a feature but there isn't any in development at the company at the moment."

The news will upset fans of traditional hand-drawn animation, who had been cheered by the revival of the form under John Lasseter, the Pixar boss who also became Disney Animation's chief creative officer in 2006. Lasseter told a London audience for a 2009 screening of Bolt (a CGI animation) that he had re-hired many of the animators who were ditched by the previous regime because of the emergence of computer-generated technology in the 1990s.

"Unfortunately 2D became the excuse for poor storytelling," said Lasseter, who pioneered the CGI animation revolution with Toy Story in 1995. "The general consensus was that audiences did not want to watch hand-drawn animated films, which is of course completely ridiculous. The day I stepped in we got in touch with these guys and set about bringing back the artists that Disney had laid off."

The studio subsequently put the hand-drawn animation The Princess and the Frog into production. The traditional musical, based on the Brothers Grimm story the Frog Prince but relocating the action to 1920s New Orleans, was well-reviewed but failed to mirror the astounding success of Pixar at the box office with a middling return of $267m (£178m). Another hand-drawn animation – 2011's Winnie the Pooh – drew praise from critics but pulled in just $33m across the globe. Meanwhile, Disney CGI efforts such as 2009's Bolt and 2010's Tangled grossed $310m and $590m respectively.

It may not all be hard lines for the style that made the studio famous, however. One US blogger covering the news of hand-drawn animation's demise has pointed to rumours that Disney is planning a feature using similar techniques to the Oscar-winning short film Paperman. That film was produced by animators working with computers who were drawing rather than modelling images. The studio's animated film arm is also offering an eight-week intern program specifically in 2D animation this summer.
:(

User avatar
Booyakasha
Supermod
Supermod
Posts: 21729
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2000 2:00 am
Location: Wisconsinland
Has thanked: 450 times
Been thanked: 2136 times

#2

Post by Booyakasha » Sat Mar 09, 2013 2:30 pm

...again?

Man.

"We're flabbergasted that 'Tangled' outperformed these two traditionally-animated movies that we marketed really half-heartedly."---Disney, waxing disingenuous
boo--------------a real american weirdo

User avatar
CaptHayfever
Supermod
Supermod
Posts: 40615
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2002 1:00 am
Location: (n) - the place where I am
Has thanked: 1220 times
Been thanked: 803 times
Contact:

#3

Post by CaptHayfever » Sat Mar 09, 2013 2:54 pm

Yeah, I only even heard about the new Pooh movie because Craig Ferguson talked about it in his Late Late Show monologue (he voiced Owl).

And remember, "I'm-a Luigi, number one!"

User avatar
I REALLY HATE POKEMON!
Member
Member
Posts: 33205
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2000 1:00 am
Location: California, U.S.A
Has thanked: 5649 times
Been thanked: 503 times

#4

Post by I REALLY HATE POKEMON! » Sun Mar 10, 2013 3:35 am

It kinda sucks because of nostalgia and all, but I wouldn't watch any new cartoons anyway. Would be nice to keep them going for the next generation of kids though.

User avatar
Deepfake
Member
Member
Posts: 41808
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2002 1:00 am
Location: Enough. My tilde has tired and shall take its leave of you.
Has thanked: 107 times
Been thanked: 47 times
Contact:

#5

Post by Deepfake » Sun Mar 10, 2013 5:39 am

Booyakasha wrote:"We're flabbergasted that 'Tangled' outperformed these two traditionally-animated movies that we marketed really half-heartedly."---Disney, waxing disingenuous
It obviously couldn't possibly help that they're so stuck up their own ass that all they do is rewrite well known classics to saddle them with more generic archetypes and overwrought singsong **** about baking cakes and being a new woman who doesn't bake cakes anymore, etc.

It's the goddamn direction that makes this stuff successful.

At least Uncle Phil was ****ing brilliant as the witchdoctor character in that Narlinz Frog Princess one. Huge lips galore, though. Like, really guys.
I muttered 'light as a board, stiff as a feather' for 2 days straight and now I've ascended, ;aughing at olympus and zeus is crying

User avatar
I REALLY HATE POKEMON!
Member
Member
Posts: 33205
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2000 1:00 am
Location: California, U.S.A
Has thanked: 5649 times
Been thanked: 503 times

#6

Post by I REALLY HATE POKEMON! » Mon Mar 11, 2013 1:03 am

The Princess and the Frog seemed forced to me. I was in an office somewhere waiting while it played, and I couldn't wait for it to end. Then it looped.

User avatar
Zebracal
Member
Member
Posts: 63
Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2013 11:40 pm

#7

Post by Zebracal » Mon Mar 11, 2013 3:01 am

Everything needs to be digitized.

My question is, is this less time consuming or more time consuming than being hand drawn.

User avatar
Sim Kid
Member
Member
Posts: 13761
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2001 1:00 am
Location: The state of Denial
Been thanked: 59 times

#8

Post by Sim Kid » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:34 pm

So... again?

User avatar
Kargath
Member
Member
Posts: 10653
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2001 1:00 am
Been thanked: 5 times

#9

Post by Kargath » Mon Apr 01, 2013 12:04 am

Kinda expected. A labor-intensive process that requires ongoing costs for staff maintenance and training - and all without high rewards for the capital investment.
Why is it drug addicts and computer afficionados are both called users?
-Clifford Stoll

Post Reply