Page 1 of 1
a shortfilm by bomby von bombsville...
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:57 pm
by Bomby
Not the greatest thing in the world, but I made this last October for class.
This was shot on black & white 16mm film.
[video]qoMGPfw6DOg[/video]
Edit: I now realize this probably should've been posted in the videos forum. Feel free to move it if you wish, Sean.
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:44 pm
by Calamity Panfan
well, since it's only a minute and ten seconds, there's not much to go off of. Camera looked a little bit shaky, but not too bad.
Of course I must say I love it if not only for including one of my favorite Joy Division songs.
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:49 pm
by Bomby
Yeah, the project was supposed to be focused on capturing interesting patterns of light with a running time around 1:00. We edited our projects by cutting and taping the actual film together. I wasn't able to get my outtakes through the telecine process (the conversion of film into digital video) so unfortunately I couldn't add more. I was able to correct one sloppy edit, though.
I would've loved to have been able to use a steadicam for the moving shots, but the University doesn't provide those for intro to production students. Besides, I was going through an "emulate Christopher Doyle" phase. There are definitely a lot of things I would do differently if I were editing it now.
I'm somewhat proud of this work, but I'll admit that there were a few other students whose projects I thought were better than mine.
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:16 am
by Deepfake
I liked the use of lighting. What causes the broken up, wavy appearance in the movement? Is that a side-effect of manipulating with the editing software? Just curious.
NIN made heavy intentional use of it in their video for "the Hand that Feeds":
YouTube - Nine Inch Nails - The Hand That Feeds: Album Version, Closed Captioned
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 2:13 pm
by Bomby
It's the ****ty telecine, which was done by the kind folks at PBS for free. The film itself runs at 24 frames per second, but they converted it to an NTSC analog rate of 29.97 fps so it could be played on a standard definition television. In doing so, they interlaced the frames to perform a 2:3 conversion. Personally, I would've rather they just added repeated frames, so they could be taken out and viewed at a natural 24 fps without the interlacing.
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 10:42 am
by Sean P Kelly
You can keep it here. I made a short film once for school too (though that one was Super 8) .