Page 1 of 1
Media's double standard.
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 6:59 am
by DarkZero
In cartoons and such, you see little boys in their underwear all the time. It's not taken as much of a problem. But whenever they show a little girl in panties, the internet is flooded with 'zomg kiddie porn!!!'. IMO, they shouldn't have that kind of stuff in their shows, boys or girls.
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 8:29 am
by Apiary Tazy
There's also Shin-Chan, though somewhat different.
I assume it for some new gross factor I've seen in some cartoons. Most of the time it isn't really funny at all, so yeah.
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 2:10 pm
by Calamity Panfan
I don't think it really matters. I haven't actually seen many cartoons involving that...
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 12:34 pm
by SephirothKirby
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 3:08 pm
by Crazyswordsman
It's like when a woman is portrayed as flirty, she's "a slut, a whore, a bitch," while a guy is "a player, a pimp, a mack-daddy." In other words, it sucks and it's not fair to women. -CSM
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 3:41 pm
by I am nobody
While I don't see a reason to be showing cartoon characters in their underwear, I don't really care if someone else does. If someone else calls that cartoon "kiddie porn", that's their opinion.
Posted: Tue Nov 25, 2008 12:19 am
by Greenmarioman
SWITZERLAND
Posted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 1:45 pm
by Vapor
Probably the reason the girls are called kiddie porn is because of our old friend the
Male Gaze.
